http://segfault.in/2010/03/keep-track-of-configuration-changes-using-etckeeper/ core dumped Sun, 05 Sep 2010 13:34:28 +0530 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 hourly 1 http://segfault.in/2010/03/keep-track-of-configuration-changes-using-etckeeper/comment-page-1/#comment-1739 geekQ Mon, 10 May 2010 23:57:11 +0000 http://segfault.in/?p=472#comment-1739 At least on Ubuntu 10.04 Lucid and according to `man etckeeper` you should not use `-m` in `sudo etckeeper commit`. Otherwise you do not get the commit message you want ("initial commit") but "-m" instead. At least on Ubuntu 10.04 Lucid and according to `man etckeeper` you should not use `-m` in `sudo etckeeper commit`. Otherwise you do not get the commit message you want (”initial commit”) but “-m” instead.

]]> http://segfault.in/2010/03/keep-track-of-configuration-changes-using-etckeeper/comment-page-1/#comment-1667 vinodvm Thu, 18 Mar 2010 02:37:02 +0000 http://segfault.in/?p=472#comment-1667 no. etckeeper is for putting /etc under version control. main use is for troubleshooting server configurations. no. etckeeper is for putting /etc under version control. main use is for troubleshooting server configurations.

]]> http://segfault.in/2010/03/keep-track-of-configuration-changes-using-etckeeper/comment-page-1/#comment-1659 EvanCarroll Wed, 17 Mar 2010 02:24:38 +0000 http://segfault.in/?p=472#comment-1659 In your eyes, does this totally replace tripwire which just, afaik, keeps checksums of files and notifies you of modifications? In your eyes, does this totally replace tripwire which just, afaik, keeps checksums of files and notifies you of modifications?

]]>